Email:
Password:

Twilight: An American Tragedy

Other Created on 1-24-08 Views(744) Story Rating G

I"m goint to start doing book reviews. It's fun, I love books, I love writing, and now I can combine the two.

     I am an avid reader. I love and read books voraciously, one of my better vices. Literature is my life. So, when my younger sister told me of the book, Twilight, I decided to take a look. She raved about how awesome it was, a wonderful book worth reading. I decided to look past the fact that it was rated young adult, (after all, there are some books for the younger crowd that have proven themselves to be great books, such as the Chronicles of Narnia, and The Golden Compass). I love vampire fiction anyway, and with that in mind, began reading Twilight.

     It was one of the worst experiences in my life.

     I have this compulsion, a personality quirk if you will. I have to finish reading a book, and book series. Even if the books prove themselves to be terrible, and shoddy. However. Twilight was the exception. It took all of my strength to finish reading that book. An ordeal that left me drained, and scarred for life. I won’t be continuing the series, as I am not fond of pain.

     It is beyond me why this book is so popular. For one thing, it is badly written. Written in first person, the book is a prime example of how first person can be abused, and mangled. Most of the book is a minute by minute account of the dull life of the main character, Bella. However, I could overlook the way the writer writes...which is terrible, if the story was good. And If the characters were compelling, and were able to show me their world, and make me feel for them. Twilight, was none of those things.

     What attracts people to vampire fiction, is the struggle of good and evil. Are vampires automatically damned? Are they trading away their souls for immortality, and twisted perfection? Is such immortality a perverse imitation of God’s plan for eternal life in Heaven? Are they evil, or is it possible for a vampire to be good? The sun (God’s light) denies them. They feast on human blood every night, when they were once human themselves. The moral quandary of vampires is what makes vampire fiction so great. Good and evil battle within every story, an eternal theme that replays every day within our lives and imaginations. Vampires eternalize that struggle, that age-old battle, within their very beings. A battle that means their soul, or the loss of such.

     Twilight manages to destroy all that is good about vampires in one foul swoop. In Twilight, vampires do not burn in sunlight. No, such a mark of evil would ruin the god-like perfection of Twilight’s vampires. Instead, they glitter in the sun. Glitter. That is perhaps one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. Instead of vampires, we now have angst ridden, depressed pseudo-angels. So beautiful and perfect, their kisses can make you faint, and no doubt their farts smell like fresh-baked cookies. The sun makes them glitter so prettily, sort of like how all those kiddie shirts have words written in glitter these days. The battle of good and evil does not exist. While the vampire, Edward, bemoans the fact that he is a vampire, the absolute perfection of his being takes away from such apparent ‘suffering.’ In fact, it makes him seem whiny, and irritating.

     Bella, the main character, is an attractive teenage girl, who moves to a new town. She is unaware of her attractiveness, so as to give her clichéd character some depth. Bella has pale skin and dark hair, as heroines of vampire fiction must be pale of skin and dark of hair. She listens to classical music, and reads classic books such as Pride and Prejudice, and Sense and Sensibility, her musical and literary choices an attempt to show how ‘unique’ and how much of a maverick she is. Bella doesn’t care about the ‘popular’ things in high school, again another trait to show us that Bella is really cool without trying, which makes her extra cool. This poorly written attempt to make Bella into an interesting and multi-faceted character, falls short, as Bella has as much depth and personality as a sheet of paper. Her character really has no interests or personality, beyond her obsessive love with the vampire Edward. In fact, it seems the only point to Bella’s life is to love Edward, as teenagers know so much about being in love. This is worse then an over-dramatized teenage romance, I could almost appreciate that. This is a soap-opera...with vampires.

     Edward’s character is absolutely perfect. A god among men. His beauty is overwhelming, and constantly noted, so we don’t forget how amazingly beautiful he is. To prove how awesome Edward is, he doesn’t hunt humans. No, Edward hunts mountain lions. It’s nice to know that we have perfect god-like vampires killing off an endangered species, as humans aren’t doing a good enough job of it. He falls in love with Bella, and her scent, which is beyond me. Edward’s character is portrayed as a perfect being. He has lived far longer then Bella, making him far beyond her in emotional and mental maturity. Yet, he loves her, a flawed human who is still little more then a child. Which makes Edward, a pedophile.

     All the characters are flat. Nothing is there to allow for the reader to connect with the character, to share their pain and love. Edward and the other vampires are too perfect, having the power of powers. A reader finds it impossible to identify with such absolute ‘perfection’. In fact, it is annoying, as how can there be any trials to overcome if the character is so perfect and amazing in every way? Bella has nothing to her character beyond love for Edward, she is just a card-board cutout to further the ‘romance’ of the story.

     The twisted farce of ‘true love’ that Twilight parades about is disturbing. A generation of young girls now believe their only goal in life to fall in love with ‘Edward.’ The main character, Bella, isn’t even liked by Twilight fans, as she is competition for Edward’s love. Twilight has created a female character that reflects poorly on the gender, diminishing all respect toward women, and showing women to be weak-willed creatures always in need of rescuing. Twilight essentially tells young girls that the only point to a girl’s life is to get a boyfriend. Find the perfect man, gain ‘true love’...and that’s about it.

     All of the above combines into what is one of the worse books in literature. It is a soap-opera, full of clichéd, trite bullshit that is enough to make someone stop reading for good. There is nothing original or creative to the book. In fact, no one likes the book because they think it is original, or a good read. They like it for Edward, they want to be Edward‘s girlfriend. Congratulation Stephanie Meyer, you have convinced young girls that their only purpose in life is to be a girlfriend for Edward. I’m a romantic myself, guilty as charged, but there was no real romance to this book. Only a bizarre obsession between two characters, both of whom have personalities that are about as interesting and multi-faceted as a potato. This is not romance.

     The book is a travesty toward vampire fiction, and romance in general. It is a sad state of affairs when a bestseller is so horrible, that there is absolutely nothing of value to it, beyond a nice cover picture. I hope that the younger generation eventually turns to better books, ones that have an actual point. A story, a message to tell, something that connects us all with a common theme, and characters that reflect our own short-comings and accomplishments. Unfortunately, that won’ happen while Stephanie Meyer continues to write kiddie slash fiction. Perhaps all the money she gains from the books, book merchandise, and movie is worth what she has lost in artistic integrity. May all the gods of literature have mercy on her soul.

Comments

Please Login to post comments
On November 17th 2009 flipitout Said: 
flipitout nice reviews :))
On September 19th 2009 WaterSheerie Said: 
WaterSheerie In response to xJesseh's comment: Consider this. Edward is a jerk, a manipulative bastard who's actions border on abusive and a stalker to boot. He breaks into Bella's room to watch her sleep, breaks her truck to keep her from seeing a friend. He takes her to an isolated meadow, looks deep into her eyes and tells her how easy it would be for him to kill her. This is not romance or love, but tell any Twifan this and the response is 'but Edward is so hot.' Since fans are ignoring Edwards's unhealthy behavior in favor of his looks, I can only conclude that most fans are shallow creatures. Edward may be the most beautiful person on the planet, but he is not kind. And it doesn't escape me that 'beautiful' is the first attribute you listed. Beauty is often the only charateristic people notice and 'love' about Edward. This is the exact definition of 'shallow.' Marrying the most beautiful person on the planet, because he is beautiful, is shallow. If the shoe fits, wear it.
On August 13th 2009 xJesseh Said: 
xJesseh Oh, sorry, nice review, though. Despite your opinion, you have a nice way with words. < 3
On August 13th 2009 xJesseh Said: 
xJesseh Haha. I suppose we young people are shallow creatures. Hot vampire boyfriends just get us every time. Personally, I'm more than willing to fall right into the evil trap that Stephanie Meyer has set for we poor young girls. Marrying the most beautiful and kind person on the planet seems perfectly logical to me.
On June 1st 2009 sarabay Said: 
sarabay Amen sister. I hate that stupid book. I want to run it over with a tractor and preferably also have Stephanie Meyer under the wheels. I hate that she ruined all that was a vampire. I mean sparkling? Come on. Who came up with that idea. Stephanie Meyer should be put out of her missery. And you're right about the whole "Bella having no unique things about her" BURN IN HELL TWILIGHT!!!!!!!!
On May 12th 2009 JDilbeck101 Said: 
JDilbeck101 Yes, I'm a Twilight's biggest fan..I love the Twilight books, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I think that if you read the book and didn't like it, well...it's your loss. But in no way shape or form, will i critsize you for your views. You have a right to them, and no one should critisize you for your ideals on the book. I personally love those books and the way Stephanie Meyer wrote them.
On March 26th 2009 xxdarkprincess Said: 
xxdarkprincess i see where you are comeing from because i know people who have the same point of view. when you said that the bok has no creativity i think you are wrong because you also commented on how she changed her vampiers how they sparkel.
On March 18th 2009 1ambeer1 Said: 
1ambeer1 i think that the all the books turned out to be really really good. and maybe if you had read all them and opened ur mind a little you might have liked it too. yeah its on a 5th or 6th grade reading level but whatever. it still..... and i do not think you are a very good critc. find a new hobby.
On February 4th 2009 ambersunset Said: 
ambersunset i think this is a very good book, but i'm not going to make fun of you or say mean things to you because you have a different opinion than you. but i think that they are very interesting and aren't writing ah-mazingly(i've acutally never met/heard of an ah-mazing writer because everyone has their flaws here and there), but they are still written well, not as bad as some people can write
On January 10th 2009 animalsavior Said: 
my picture
I agree with everyone else. You have to remember this book is written on 5th-6th grade level. It is great!
On December 15th 2008 KIRKME Said: 
KIRKME TWIGHLIGHT IS AWESOMZE! u r not a good critc
On November 30th 2008 LOVEFIRST Said: 
LOVEFIRST U SUCK TWILIGHT ROCKS!!!!!!!!! BELLA IS NOT ATTRACTIVE SHES JUST NEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!! U WOULD HAVE LIKED TH BOOKS IF YOU HAD UNDERSTOOD THEM EVERYBODY HATES U CAUSE U HATE TWILIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I HATE U!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On November 10th 2008 Silverarctos Said: 
my picture
There is no such thing as an overpopulated place of an ENDANGERED SPECIES! If that was so, then they wouldn't be endangered! And I completely agree with this review of the book. Twilight has to be the worse book I ever forced myself to read. Why did I read it then? Cause I was filled with lies from idiots (or people that I now know are idiots... which could almost be a lot of people...) who said, "The book gets better the farther you get." LIES! Plus, now there is a ridiculous movie about the book. Great. Something far worse then the book. A movie that rips off whatever book it is based on. And the glittery sun thing... pathetic. Vampires may not exist, but someone created them and it's kinda like murdering a great idea by making vampires glittery.
On October 25th 2008 kevenblack Said: 
my picture
There are some things wrong with your report. One, Edward hunts mountsin lions in places with an overgrown population. Two,if girls want to run around thinking their "Edward" is going to show up like the real one did, that's their fault. And Three, VAMPIRES DON'T EXIST so how can the little glittery sun thing be a problem? If we don't have anything to base it on, how do we know that it's not real? Ya, think about THAT.
On August 22nd 2008 sadidaisbroken Said: 
sadidaisbroken LMFAO!!! and anyone else wonder what happens when Bella's on her period? does Edward go dumpster diving? if he's so addicted to her blood, her "sent" wouldn't that just kinda, well you know, screw him and his brothers over when it was her time of month? LMFAO sry... but could you imagine? it would totality make him a less perfect god if he went all freaky vampire eating a tampon HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! all the little girls would get all grossed out and hate him and such... but truly it does annoy me that that was never part of the story (it would have been funny if you ask me)... if the book is of a couple years wouldn't you kind of expect that to matter? lol my best friend is an avid (obsessed) fan and she hates me for hating the book. i hate books like twilight because they often make girls want perfection out of guys. these books convince girls to swoon after the first boy who looks hot (even if he's an ass fuck) rather than going for the guy who would be worthwhile. it allso leads to the expectation of instant romance, that is, they expect too much out of young guys. they also tend to believe that if they think their in love that means that they will be with that person for the rest of their lives and that seems to make them think that all in all sex is alright cause he's gonna be with her forever... not to mention that bella and Edward have sex in the forth book that while not described in detail, is depicted as something alright and enjoyable on the first time as well as any time afterwards. though they only have sex after the marriage i have a feeling that the younger readers will not catch the sex after marriage message but rather the sex is fun message... well sry that i ranted... but still... i agree with you...
On July 30th 2008 sportshottie4e Said: 
sportshottie4e you are intitled to your own opinion yes but i am a big fan of twilight and i was wondering if you ever asked people what made twilight so great to them???
On July 27th 2008 BabyXDollX101 Said: 
BabyXDollX101 Yes, I am a Twilight fan, I am not here to "Attack" You though. Everyone is entitled to your own opinions. I would have to disagree with you though, but I was wondering, what is the book, A Great and Terrible Beauty, about>?
On June 25th 2008 Artemisseven Said: 
Artemisseven I love the Twilight books, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I think that if you read the book and didn't like it, well...it's your loss. But in no way shape or form, will i critsize you for your views. You have a right to them, and no one should critisize you for your ideals on the book. I personally love those books and the way Stephanie Meyer wrote them.
On June 14th 2008 twilight8218 Said: 
twilight8218 i have to agree with many parts on this... even though I did like Twilight but in my defense I read practically all the Vampire stories out there today... my best friend read this and immediately fell in love with Edward and now she dreams about him and makes comments about how sexy he is... but unlike you I enjoyed Twilight for various reasons but I respect that you didn't
On June 6th 2008 orangefizzpop Said: 
orangefizzpop And the thing about glitter and vampires hunting mountain lions? :D It brought that to light, I didn't really notice those details until I read your review. It really is kinda stupid..
On June 6th 2008 orangefizzpop Said: 
orangefizzpop Haha, I have to say that I agree with everything you said, because I felt the same way. My sister pushed me to read it everyday until I couldn't stand it anymore, so I picked up a copy from the library. It didn't take me that long to read because the words just flew by my eyes and didn't affect me at all. The book felt like it didn't have enough descriptions and conveyed boring emotions that I didn't feel (when I read, I feel what the characters are feeling..). Bella was just this boring person, who, in my eyes, was the girl who sat herself in a corner and stared at things, and didn't care much about her life- it wasn't interesting and nothing seemed to catch my eye that was unique about her except her name (I like the name Bella :]). Edward, as you said, is the perfect being and I agree with how you said the author made the book for the purpose of telling girls their main goal in life is to get a boyfriend, namely a guy like him. I was also nodding my head (quite vigorously :p) when you stated the characters are "flat" and as deep as a sheet of paper. The only thing I remembered about the book right after I finished it was when Bella was taken hostage by some vampire (?) and Edward saved her... I don't remember anything else because I couldn't get completely immersed in the book like my other two sisters were for some strange reason, and I didn't bother getting the other two books.. maybe the movie will portray what Stephanie Meyer couldn't, unless she was the one who wrote or co-wrote it... This was a really great review :) I can't fathom why everyone here said you were 'bashing' Twilight because everything you said here was absolutely true..two in a million, eh? :)
On April 24th 2008 WaterSheerie Said: 
WaterSheerie It is pretty funny. It gets better, apparently one of the users who commented on this, posted a link to this page in a Twilight forum, inviting other users there to come and yell at me. They were actually making threats of violence and death toward me. One girl wanted to 'shank' me, I had to laugh at that. I love the comment below with the 'burning building' analogy. Basically saying that I can't call Twilight a bad book, because it isn't a bad book. A beautiful display of 'begging the question', brilliantly illogical and utterly inane, and she even calls me 'dear' to boot. aghsnataliee, dear, you can't repeat a premise as a conclusion with an argument. That's a fallacy of presumption, dear, and makes for an invalid arguement.
On January 25th 2008 lovleeleigh Said: 
lovleeleigh Ok, I am a Twilight fan, but I am not here to trash talk and I am not going to write my own review for the simple fact that I am lazy, lol. I did not mind that you did not like the book...not everyone is. As a critic though you should not "attack' the people the people who do or the author. You come off as being just as juvenile as the fangirls. *That is pretty much advice for anyone who reads this, btw". ONE ANOTHER NOTE: "Perks..." (in my opinion) is a good read!
On January 25th 2008 WaterSheerie Said: 
WaterSheerie Here's an idea for Twilight fans, who find this review to be wrong. Why don't you all write your own reviews? Write about why you love the book, and why it's so 'awesome', instead of personally attacking me. It's much more productive, and provides a more suitable rebuttal to my own review, rather then insults. Cheers :)
On January 25th 2008 WaterSheerie Said: 
WaterSheerie Ah, well, now I feel better. There are some fans that can be reasonable, and though disagree with me, are not throwing a hissy fit. I applaud all Twilight fans that are being reasonable and mature, while their comments are in the minority here, they are presenting a better view for their book. In all honesty, I did not expect this much fuss. I didn't even expect anyone to actually read this, much less give it points. Surprise, surprise. We'll see how the next review goes. Heads up: the book I shall review next will be Perks of Being a Wallflower...coming next week. Cheers :)