Email:
Password:

Created By

Rate this Story

+15

Embed


My Stories
+ 15
Twilight: An American Tragedy
+ 12
Death Of Originality...And A Salesman.
+ 6
I Could Not Stop For Death. Chapter 3
+ 7
I Could Not Stop For Death. Chapter 2
+ 9
I Could Not Stop For Death. Chp. 1
+ 6
I Could Not Stop For Death. Prologue.

Twilight: An American Tragedy

Other Created on 1-24-08 Views(493) Story Rating G

I"m goint to start doing book reviews. It's fun, I love books, I love writing, and now I can combine the two.

     I am an avid reader. I love and read books voraciously, one of my better vices. Literature is my life. So, when my younger sister told me of the book, Twilight, I decided to take a look. She raved about how awesome it was, a wonderful book worth reading. I decided to look past the fact that it was rated young adult, (after all, there are some books for the younger crowd that have proven themselves to be great books, such as the Chronicles of Narnia, and The Golden Compass). I love vampire fiction anyway, and with that in mind, began reading Twilight.

     It was one of the worst experiences in my life.

     I have this compulsion, a personality quirk if you will. I have to finish reading a book, and book series. Even if the books prove themselves to be terrible, and shoddy. However. Twilight was the exception. It took all of my strength to finish reading that book. An ordeal that left me drained, and scarred for life. I won’t be continuing the series, as I am not fond of pain.

     It is beyond me why this book is so popular. For one thing, it is badly written. Written in first person, the book is a prime example of how first person can be abused, and mangled. Most of the book is a minute by minute account of the dull life of the main character, Bella. However, I could overlook the way the writer writes...which is terrible, if the story was good. And If the characters were compelling, and were able to show me their world, and make me feel for them. Twilight, was none of those things.

     What attracts people to vampire fiction, is the struggle of good and evil. Are vampires automatically damned? Are they trading away their souls for immortality, and twisted perfection? Is such immortality a perverse imitation of God’s plan for eternal life in Heaven? Are they evil, or is it possible for a vampire to be good? The sun (God’s light) denies them. They feast on human blood every night, when they were once human themselves. The moral quandary of vampires is what makes vampire fiction so great. Good and evil battle within every story, an eternal theme that replays every day within our lives and imaginations. Vampires eternalize that struggle, that age-old battle, within their very beings. A battle that means their soul, or the loss of such.

     Twilight manages to destroy all that is good about vampires in one foul swoop. In Twilight, vampires do not burn in sunlight. No, such a mark of evil would ruin the god-like perfection of Twilight’s vampires. Instead, they glitter in the sun. Glitter. That is perhaps one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. Instead of vampires, we now have angst ridden, depressed pseudo-angels. So beautiful and perfect, their kisses can make you faint, and no doubt their farts smell like fresh-baked cookies. The sun makes them glitter so prettily, sort of like how all those kiddie shirts have words written in glitter these days. The battle of good and evil does not exist. While the vampire, Edward, bemoans the fact that he is a vampire, the absolute perfection of his being takes away from such apparent ‘suffering.’ In fact, it makes him seem whiny, and irritating.

     Bella, the main character, is an attractive teenage girl, who moves to a new town. She is unaware of her attractiveness, so as to give her clichéd character some depth. Bella has pale skin and dark hair, as heroines of vampire fiction must be pale of skin and dark of hair. She listens to classical music, and reads classic books such as Pride and Prejudice, and Sense and Sensibility, her musical and literary choices an attempt to show how ‘unique’ and how much of a maverick she is. Bella doesn’t care about the ‘popular’ things in high school, again another trait to show us that Bella is really cool without trying, which makes her extra cool. This poorly written attempt to make Bella into an interesting and multi-faceted character, falls short, as Bella has as much depth and personality as a sheet of paper. Her character really has no interests or personality, beyond her obsessive love with the vampire Edward. In fact, it seems the only point to Bella’s life is to love Edward, as teenagers know so much about being in love. This is worse then an over-dramatized teenage romance, I could almost appreciate that. This is a soap-opera...with vampires.

     Edward’s character is absolutely perfect. A god among men. His beauty is overwhelming, and constantly noted, so we don’t forget how amazingly beautiful he is. To prove how awesome Edward is, he doesn’t hunt humans. No, Edward hunts mountain lions. It’s nice to know that we have perfect god-like vampires killing off an endangered species, as humans aren’t doing a good enough job of it. He falls in love with Bella, and her scent, which is beyond me. Edward’s character is portrayed as a perfect being. He has lived far longer then Bella, making him far beyond her in emotional and mental maturity. Yet, he loves her, a flawed human who is still little more then a child. Which makes Edward, a pedophile.

     All the characters are flat. Nothing is there to allow for the reader to connect with the character, to share their pain and love. Edward and the other vampires are too perfect, having the power of powers. A reader finds it impossible to identify with such absolute ‘perfection’. In fact, it is annoying, as how can there be any trials to overcome if the character is so perfect and amazing in every way? Bella has nothing to her character beyond love for Edward, she is just a card-board cutout to further the ‘romance’ of the story.

     The twisted farce of ‘true love’ that Twilight parades about is disturbing. A generation of young girls now believe their only goal in life to fall in love with ‘Edward.’ The main character, Bella, isn’t even liked by Twilight fans, as she is competition for Edward’s love. Twilight has created a female character that reflects poorly on the gender, diminishing all respect toward women, and showing women to be weak-willed creatures always in need of rescuing. Twilight essentially tells young girls that the only point to a girl’s life is to get a boyfriend. Find the perfect man, gain ‘true love’...and that’s about it.

     All of the above combines into what is one of the worse books in literature. It is a soap-opera, full of clichéd, trite bullshit that is enough to make someone stop reading for good. There is nothing original or creative to the book. In fact, no one likes the book because they think it is original, or a good read. They like it for Edward, they want to be Edward‘s girlfriend. Congratulation Stephanie Meyer, you have convinced young girls that their only purpose in life is to be a girlfriend for Edward. I’m a romantic myself, guilty as charged, but there was no real romance to this book. Only a bizarre obsession between two characters, both of whom have personalities that are about as interesting and multi-faceted as a potato. This is not romance.

     The book is a travesty toward vampire fiction, and romance in general. It is a sad state of affairs when a bestseller is so horrible, that there is absolutely nothing of value to it, beyond a nice cover picture. I hope that the younger generation eventually turns to better books, ones that have an actual point. A story, a message to tell, something that connects us all with a common theme, and characters that reflect our own short-comings and accomplishments. Unfortunately, that won’ happen while Stephanie Meyer continues to write kiddie slash fiction. Perhaps all the money she gains from the books, book merchandise, and movie is worth what she has lost in artistic integrity. May all the gods of literature have mercy on her soul.

Comments

Please Login to post comments
On August 22nd 2008 sadidaisbroken Said :
sadidaisbroken LMFAO!!! and anyone else wonder what happens when Bella's on her period? does Edward go dumpster diving? if he's so addicted to her blood, her "sent" wouldn't that just kinda, well you know, screw him and his brothers over when it was her time of month? LMFAO sry... but could you imagine? it would totality make him a less perfect god if he went all freaky vampire eating a tampon HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! all the little girls would get all grossed out and hate him and such... but truly it does annoy me that that was never part of the story (it would have been funny if you ask me)... if the book is of a couple years wouldn't you kind of expect that to matter? lol my best friend is an avid (obsessed) fan and she hates me for hating the book. i hate books like twilight because they often make girls want perfection out of guys. these books convince girls to swoon after the first boy who looks hot (even if he's an ass fuck) rather than going for the guy who would be worthwhile. it allso leads to the expectation of instant romance, that is, they expect too much out of young guys. they also tend to believe that if they think their in love that means that they will be with that person for the rest of their lives and that seems to make them think that all in all sex is alright cause he's gonna be with her forever... not to mention that bella and Edward have sex in the forth book that while not described in detail, is depicted as something alright and enjoyable on the first time as well as any time afterwards. though they only have sex after the marriage i have a feeling that the younger readers will not catch the sex after marriage message but rather the sex is fun message... well sry that i ranted... but still... i agree with you...
On July 30th 2008 sportshottie4e Said :
sportshottie4e you are intitled to your own opinion yes but i am a big fan of twilight and i was wondering if you ever asked people what made twilight so great to them???
On July 27th 2008 BabyXDollX101 Said :
BabyXDollX101 Yes, I am a Twilight fan, I am not here to "Attack" You though. Everyone is entitled to your own opinions. I would have to disagree with you though, but I was wondering, what is the book, A Great and Terrible Beauty, about>?
On June 25th 2008 Artemisseven Said :
Artemisseven I love the Twilight books, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I think that if you read the book and didn't like it, well...it's your loss. But in no way shape or form, will i critsize you for your views. You have a right to them, and no one should critisize you for your ideals on the book. I personally love those books and the way Stephanie Meyer wrote them.
On June 14th 2008 twilight8218 Said :
twilight8218 i have to agree with many parts on this... even though I did like Twilight but in my defense I read practically all the Vampire stories out there today... my best friend read this and immediately fell in love with Edward and now she dreams about him and makes comments about how sexy he is... but unlike you I enjoyed Twilight for various reasons but I respect that you didn't
On June 6th 2008 orangefizzpop Said :
orangefizzpop And the thing about glitter and vampires hunting mountain lions? :D It brought that to light, I didn't really notice those details until I read your review. It really is kinda stupid..
On June 6th 2008 orangefizzpop Said :
orangefizzpop Haha, I have to say that I agree with everything you said, because I felt the same way. My sister pushed me to read it everyday until I couldn't stand it anymore, so I picked up a copy from the library. It didn't take me that long to read because the words just flew by my eyes and didn't affect me at all. The book felt like it didn't have enough descriptions and conveyed boring emotions that I didn't feel (when I read, I feel what the characters are feeling..). Bella was just this boring person, who, in my eyes, was the girl who sat herself in a corner and stared at things, and didn't care much about her life- it wasn't interesting and nothing seemed to catch my eye that was unique about her except her name (I like the name Bella :]). Edward, as you said, is the perfect being and I agree with how you said the author made the book for the purpose of telling girls their main goal in life is to get a boyfriend, namely a guy like him. I was also nodding my head (quite vigorously :p) when you stated the characters are "flat" and as deep as a sheet of paper. The only thing I remembered about the book right after I finished it was when Bella was taken hostage by some vampire (?) and Edward saved her... I don't remember anything else because I couldn't get completely immersed in the book like my other two sisters were for some strange reason, and I didn't bother getting the other two books.. maybe the movie will portray what Stephanie Meyer couldn't, unless she was the one who wrote or co-wrote it... This was a really great review :) I can't fathom why everyone here said you were 'bashing' Twilight because everything you said here was absolutely true..two in a million, eh? :)
On April 24th 2008 WaterSheerie Said :
WaterSheerie It is pretty funny. It gets better, apparently one of the users who commented on this, posted a link to this page in a Twilight forum, inviting other users there to come and yell at me. They were actually making threats of violence and death toward me. One girl wanted to 'shank' me, I had to laugh at that. I love the comment below with the 'burning building' analogy. Basically saying that I can't call Twilight a bad book, because it isn't a bad book. A beautiful display of 'begging the question', brilliantly illogical and utterly inane, and she even calls me 'dear' to boot. aghsnataliee, dear, you can't repeat a premise as a conclusion with an argument. That's a fallacy of presumption, dear, and makes for an invalid arguement.
On March 24th 2008 numbbbb0z Said :
numbbbb0z I wish I could get this kind of feedback on MY works. Daaammn you, Sheerie! I am envious of you! DAAMMMNNN yooou!!!
On March 24th 2008 numbbbb0z Said :
numbbbb0z If I were the author of Twilight, I'd be ashamed to have xmarisunshinex as a fan, who can't deal with someone offering their constructive reviews of a highly popular book. But grats on ya, Sheerie :) I enjoyed reading your review :)
On January 25th 2008 lovleeleigh Said :
lovleeleigh Ok, I am a Twilight fan, but I am not here to trash talk and I am not going to write my own review for the simple fact that I am lazy, lol. I did not mind that you did not like the book...not everyone is. As a critic though you should not "attack' the people the people who do or the author. You come off as being just as juvenile as the fangirls. *That is pretty much advice for anyone who reads this, btw". ONE ANOTHER NOTE: "Perks..." (in my opinion) is a good read!
On January 25th 2008 WaterSheerie Said :
WaterSheerie Here's an idea for Twilight fans, who find this review to be wrong. Why don't you all write your own reviews? Write about why you love the book, and why it's so 'awesome', instead of personally attacking me. It's much more productive, and provides a more suitable rebuttal to my own review, rather then insults. Cheers :)
On January 25th 2008 WaterSheerie Said :
WaterSheerie Ah, well, now I feel better. There are some fans that can be reasonable, and though disagree with me, are not throwing a hissy fit. I applaud all Twilight fans that are being reasonable and mature, while their comments are in the minority here, they are presenting a better view for their book. In all honesty, I did not expect this much fuss. I didn't even expect anyone to actually read this, much less give it points. Surprise, surprise. We'll see how the next review goes. Heads up: the book I shall review next will be Perks of Being a Wallflower...coming next week. Cheers :)
On January 25th 2008 RandomXOne Said :
RandomXOne This is great! Thank you for writing this!
On January 25th 2008 Scarx Said :
Scarx I enjoyed the Twilight series. It was not my favorite book, but not to shabby. It wasn't poorly written , but it could have been better. But then again the same goes for HP. I see where you're coming from on all of your points and I think they're valid. But I don't think they apply to everyone. I enjoyed your writing because all I've seen so far about the book is "ZoMg!!!111!! TwIlIghT RRROoockzzz!!1 Good job. p.s. I wish you luck swimming out of these fan girls.
On January 25th 2008 TaylorAlexis12 Said :
TaylorAlexis12 I must say that I love Twilight, it is one of my favorite books of all time. Among the many reasons for loving this book (No, none of those reasons are for Edward, or wanting Edward for a boyfriend, we are 'young adults' here, and sure some of us want to believe in fairy tales, but not all of us are bubble heads trying to make him real) I love the way Stephenie Meyer portrays her own idea of vampires, especially since the idea came to her in a dream. I love the bizzare connection of Edward and Bella and the conflict later with Jacob, which you won't ever experience (2nd and 3rd books) and if you would just give the series a chance you would probably find them much more interesting. I have nothing against Twilight, though I found the 3rd book the best. Please do not bash books, when you know people are likely to get pissed. You had to know that there were millions of Twilight fans out there and no, most of us aren't immature. You should really gain a new perspective of these wonderful books and maybe a less shallow view of love. I do, however, respect your freedom of speech, though I thoroughly disagree.
On January 25th 2008 WaterSheerie Said :
WaterSheerie I love it. Freedom of speech is now in danger of Twilight fans, who can't handle the idea that people don't like the book. Hilarious. Perhaps if I hand out my address, they will strap bombs to their chests and come for a visit. To be honest, this is the biggest thing that annoys me about Twilight. The fact that the fans throw temper tantrums over any dissenting opinion. I have my own favorite books. I understand that not everyone shares my favorites, and am (brace yourselves) fine with that. People have their own opinions concerning books. I had hoped that people could be a little more mature about this, but I suppose that was too much to ask for. I will be writing another book review, possibly next week. Cheers :)
On January 24th 2008 o0jinglbells0o Said :
o0jinglbells0o Okay, before i say anything, i have to admit, that i really do enjoy Twilight. Although I do enjoy the morbid/cruel reality of the traditional vampire, i believe this must be one of the most interesting chick lit books i have ever read. Although, some of your facts are true. I absoulutely despise how weak and defenseless Stephenie meyer makes Bella, and yes, sometimes it seems that Edward is nothing more than a pretty face. But still, in my opinion, this series is addicting. Although, if you are searching for depth, i suggest you try "A Great and Terrible Beauty", it has a touch of dark fantasy, lots of deep characters, a puzzling and twisting plot, along with morbid descriptions and no definite line between good and evil. I believe, due to your review, that you would quite enjoy it. I know it sounds stupid and slightly shallow, but i believe you will enjoy it, it is my favorite series. It's by libba Bray... READ it
On January 24th 2008 brokenwings122 Said :
brokenwings122 First of all, no where in your review do you say anything about Twilight fans, other than the effect you feel the book has on young girls. Second, yes bashing. An opinion is one thing, but you are saying the book is terrible because you don't like what the author did with it. Don't forget that a long time ago someone came up with the "norm" for vampires. It takes a lot more creativity to come up with a different view of them than it is to simply use the one everyone else does. As you've proven both in your poorly constructed review as well as in your completely random comments. Its quite clear that Stephanie Meyer has more creativity and class in her pinky than you do in your entire body. To Everyone Who Has Not Read Twilight: Please know that while we all seem very heated about your opinions you shouldn't take any of them as law. Everyone likes different things and you truely should read the book for yourselves. Keeping and open mind is key!
On January 24th 2008 arkseeker Said :
my picture
ok seriously this sounds like ur bashing it cuz its not what u agree with. that is kinda snobby to say something is so horrible just cuz it does not go along with what you think should be in a book. every author has there own way of seeing things and creates their own characters so how u THINK a vampire should be is irrelevant since this is stephenie meyers version of them. and i have read all the books and alot of the things u addressed that irritate you are in them. twilight is the beginning it starts out the relationship between edward and bella you cant expect the first book to contain every single aspect of their life. also the way you said that fans dont like the book they just like edward is the STUPIDEST thing ive ever heard. i know plenty of ppl who like them and hate edward they just like the story. so dont judge twilight based on what u want in a vampire book and how u think things should be because as much as u are entitled to ur oppinion so is stephanie meyer and all of her fans. just cuz u didnt like the book does not give you the right to blatantly insult it. take that in to consideration when u decide to bash something.
On January 24th 2008 aghsnataliee Said :
aghsnataliee Alright dear, I have nothing against the way you have thrown your opinion out, I mean it's what your allowed to do, for the constitution states it loudly, and clearly. But, my dear what you have stated in this...how should I put it, interesting, perhaps, review you have yelled "FIRE!" during a theater production when there is obviously no fire. I'll put it my metaphorical phrase--Disrespecting the book is stated in the first amendment as okay, disrespecting Stephenie Meyer is yelling "FIRE!" at a theater production, with--like i said--no fire. Yes, she is no Emily Bronte, Jane Austen, Mary Shelly, ect...But she is what she is, and let's all remember this was the first book she had ever written, other than her stories she did just out of the love of writing. I'm sure your thinking what you said in a comment towards others peoples comments because they responded to you with profanity and yes I'm going to say it animosity; "I have to say that the Twilight fans are proving one thing...that I am right. It's funny how the slightist criticism to Twilight manages to turn any fan into a madman/woman. They screech and shout, unable to tolerate any opinion other then their own. It's mildly humorous, in a pathetic sort of way." Well, sweetheart I'm going to say--I agree. Yes, I am a big fan of the books, and I love them with my whole heart, and us fans, we do get anal about these books that we happen to love. Wouldn't you dear? Maybe not the books, but something you love? I am not ranting on you for writing this review, even though I do think it is quiet mmm...atrocious. All I ask of is please dear, next time you want to yell "FIRE!" during a theater production when there is maybe not a huge fire but, please, please, make sure there is at least a small inferno? You obviously didn't see the whole beautiful story behind it all, you somehow turned it into something you felt you just couldn't bare. Grow up dear, look at something more than one way. That's what you are supposed to do when you reads books, look at them not at only one way. Goodness love, you crack me up. My dear you have proved to me nothing but stupidity, and well if i were to put it immaturely, you are an "ATTENTION WHORE." So hmm, darling from now on before you want to open your mouth towards a book, make sure you know what you are talking about, and you know what you are doing. And just so we're clear never, I MEAN NEVER INSULT Stephenie Meyer again. Oh and if you think you're such an amazing writer, I can't wait to see your book on the NEW YORK TIMES BEST SELLERS LIST. Always, Myself.
On January 24th 2008 aephoenix Said :
aephoenix Never read the book but if you're into vampire shows check out Blood Ties. Its currently not on air, but is on the mylifetime.com site. They have the entire series on their. But I do have to thank you now I won't bother reading Twilight! ;)
On January 24th 2008 xmarisunshinex Said :
my picture
Twilight was a poorly written book? Nobody really cares, but fine. This was a very poorly written review. I can't say, "LyK ZOMFGz u ToTaLlY BaSh3d mAh VaMps, y0oh BiOtch!" because not only is criticizing a book part of reviewing it, some of the things you said are also true. Bella is a cliched character. The world of vampires is twisted into something beautifully tragic rather than the absolute horror a lot of people like. But really, I think YOUR REVIEW has less "depth and personality" than my 5-five-year-old niece's review of Barney. NOT because you criticize the book, but because it wasn't criticized intelligently or sensibly. Rather, it seems like this wasn't your type of book. You don't like these vampires, fine, you can say whatever you want about that, but saying Twilight's taken everything that's good about vampires and screwed it up it being TOO subjective. It's kind of like what I imagine a kid would write if his mom made him write an essay about why he doesn't like vegetables ("Vegetables are stupid, blah blah blah..." No depth or ACTUAL reasoning) You also tend to exaggerate. I actually have a million things to say about your review, but I'll just stop at that, since it'd be pointless to ramble on and repeat the same crap over and over again. Little advice, though: Next time you review a book, make sure you can disciss it like an adult, like extend your vocabulary (not just using "big girl" language every few sentences, to make up for saying "how writers write"), and avoid also the stupid redundancy.... oh, and using good grammar would make you more credible.
On January 24th 2008 xmarisunshinex Said :
my picture
Twilight was a poorly written book? Nobody really cares, but fine. This was a very poorly written review. I can't say, "LyK ZOMFGz u ToTaLlY BaSh3d mAh VaMps, y0oh BiOtch!" because not only is criticizing a book part of reviewing it, some of the things you said are also true. Bella is a cliched character. The world of vampires is twisted into something beautifully tragic rather than the absolute horror a lot of people like. But really, I think YOUR REVIEW has less "depth and personality" than my 5-five-year-old niece's review of Barney. NOT because you criticize the book, but because it wasn't criticized intelligently or sensibly. Rather, it seems like this wasn't your type of book. You don't like these vampires, fine, you can say whatever you want about that, but saying Twilight's taken everything that's good about vampires and screwed it up it being TOO subjective. It's kind of like what I imagine a kid would write if his mom made him write an essay about why he doesn't like vegetables ("Vegetables are stupid, blah blah blah..." No depth or ACTUAL reasoning) You also tend to exaggerate. I actually have a million things to say about your review, but I'll just stop at that, since it'd be pointless to ramble on and repeat the same crap over and over again. Little advice, though: Next time you review a book, make sure you can disciss it like an adult, like extend your vocabulary (not just using "big girl" language every few sentences, to make up for saying "how writers write"), and avoid also the stupid redundancy.... oh, and using good grammar would make you more credible.
On January 24th 2008 xmarisunshinex Said :
my picture
Twilight was a poorly written book? Nobody really cares, but fine. This was a very poorly written review. I can't say, "LyK ZOMFGz u ToTaLlY BaSh3d mAh VaMps, y0oh BiOtch!" because not only is criticizing a book part of reviewing it, some of the things you said are also true. Bella is a cliched character. The world of vampires is twisted into something beautifully tragic rather than the absolute horror a lot of people like. But really, I think YOUR REVIEW has less "depth and personality" than my 5-five-year-old niece's review of Barney. NOT because you criticize the book, but because it wasn't criticized intelligently or sensibly. Rather, it seems like this wasn't your type of book. You don't like these vampires, fine, you can say whatever you want about that, but saying Twilight's taken everything that's good about vampires and screwed it up it being TOO subjective. It's kind of like what I imagine a kid would write if his mom made him write an essay about why he doesn't like vegetables ("Vegetables are stupid, blah blah blah..." No depth or ACTUAL reasoning) You also tend to exaggerate. I actually have a million things to say about your review, but I'll just stop at that, since it'd be pointless to ramble on and repeat the same crap over and over again. Little advice, though: Next time you review a book, make sure you can disciss it like an adult, like extend your vocabulary (not just using "big girl" language every few sentences, to make up for saying "how writers write"), and avoid also the stupid redundancy.... oh, and using good grammar would make you more credible.