Tests & Quizzes
Meet People
  Social  
Writing
Comedy
    Art    
Email:
Password:

Created By

Rate
XXFictitiousXX
+4

Info

Link:
In: Chats
Replies: 69
Views: 631
Created: 10/28 01:40 pm

Moderators

XXFictitiousXX
Creator

Create Social

Top Socials Today

+ 2 Chats
W3

Question...

qn- is failin to reply running away... and does running away make the other person winner ??

when is running = scared vs. smart

Some of TEsty's beloved paradoxes
The walkin contradictions

1. claimin someone is a waste of time is simply acknowledgin that you have spent some time botherin with their 'stupid' comment
2. ... sticking a 'this doesn't make sense' when the social in question clearly has replies from people who do understand

Smith's TEsty analysis

1.What they say: "Well you're entitled to your opinion"
What they mean: "What the fuck are you talking about you friggin' idiot?"

2.What they say: "Why do you have to be so opinionated all the time?"
What they mean: "Why do you have to be right all the time?"


Please Login to post comments
In response to XXFictitiousXX At 12:28 am laneman86 Said :
+1  
I'm confused.
Online laneman86's Profile laneman86's Website laneman86's AIM
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to laneman86 At 12:25 am XXFictitiousXX Said :
+1  
as in the use of 'winner' in general
Offine XXFictitiousXX's Profile XXFictitiousXX's MSN
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to XXFictitiousXX At 12:23 am laneman86 Said :
+1  
Sorry I was eating some fruit. I can't define a winner of a debate. A team of judges usually do that. There's no concise definition of a winner but there are some guidelines that judges use. If you want another example just watch the different news channels after a presidential debate. They all judge who the winner was based on their own set of guidelines.
Online laneman86's Profile laneman86's Website laneman86's AIM
Reply Spam | Block User
At 12:14 am XXFictitiousXX Said :
+1  
a winner is...?
(make it as concise as you can)
Offine XXFictitiousXX's Profile XXFictitiousXX's MSN
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to laneman86 At 12:02 am XXFictitiousXX Said :
+1  
indeed ...

and in clarification...oxford dictionary concise meaning...

you're dictionary definition of 'winning'... ??
(for the purpose of clarification)
Offine XXFictitiousXX's Profile XXFictitiousXX's MSN
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to XXFictitiousXX At 12:00 am laneman86 Said :
+1  
Yes there's a such thing as a winner of an argument technically. But just because someone is a winner doesn't mean his or her point is more correct, it just means he happens to be better at defending it.
Online laneman86's Profile laneman86's Website laneman86's AIM
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to laneman86 At 11:58 pm XXFictitiousXX Said :
+2  
true once the persoanl comments come out...and for those who need clarification...'personal' as in attacks on race, sex, family, intelligence etc...

once they come out it's not doing anything but causing pain...it's not conctructive in any means
Offine XXFictitiousXX's Profile XXFictitiousXX's MSN
Reply Spam | Block User
At 11:56 pm XXFictitiousXX Said :
+2  
is this stupid arguemnt's basis perhaps in 'winner'...is there such thing ??
Offine XXFictitiousXX's Profile XXFictitiousXX's MSN
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to XXFictitiousXX At 11:56 pm laneman86 Said :
+1  
Well that's all just terminology but I just mean there's a line between a constructive debate or discussion or whatever and something that is just an anger driven argument that can and usually does turn personal.
Online laneman86's Profile laneman86's Website laneman86's AIM
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to XXFictitiousXX At 11:54 pm laneman86 Said :
+1  
That's true is is a power thing. But when it becomes that I usually get out of the convo because I'm not interested in fighting for power... others can have it.
Online laneman86's Profile laneman86's Website laneman86's AIM
Reply Spam | Block User
At 11:52 pm XXFictitiousXX Said :
+1  
debates are arguements...ur thinkin of discussions i think...they're very constructive....can be disagreements...but you'll get ppl taking all sides and multiple sides...ppl stay open
Offine XXFictitiousXX's Profile XXFictitiousXX's MSN
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to laneman86 At 11:46 pm XXFictitiousXX Said :
+1  
a debate, yes...produces a good 'debator'...and as u said not necessarily the truth...

u can argue something down factually...they may not have anymore evidence supporting their point... but it is also very much a power thing...intimidation
Offine XXFictitiousXX's Profile XXFictitiousXX's MSN
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to XXFictitiousXX At 11:42 pm laneman86 Said :
+1  
lol, sure thing. Well I don't think that choosing not to respond is running away. I think in many cases it's wiser to listen more and speak less, and letting someone else have the last word doesn't mean they won anything. I think a debate mostly produces the better debater, not necessarily the truth. The benefit of a debate of course is the facts that are presented. I also think there's a difference between debating and arguing, and when personal insults start getting thrown I usually give up the conversation, but that doesn't mean I'm conceding my point.
Online laneman86's Profile laneman86's Website laneman86's AIM
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to laneman86 At 11:37 pm XXFictitiousXX Said :
+1  
he hated white supremacy...can't say i don't agree

anyways the topic please my good sir
Offine XXFictitiousXX's Profile XXFictitiousXX's MSN
Reply Spam | Block User
In response to XXFictitiousXX At 11:35 pm laneman86 Said :
+1  
Malcolm X was an advocate of violence and racism.
Online laneman86's Profile laneman86's Website laneman86's AIM
Reply Spam | Block User